Medical Terminology Daily (MTD) is a blog sponsored by Clinical Anatomy Associates, Inc. as a service to the medical community. We post anatomical, medical or surgical terms, their meaning and usage, as well as biographical notes on anatomists, surgeons, and researchers through the ages. Be warned that some of the images used depict human anatomical specimens.
You are welcome to submit questions and suggestions using our "Contact Us" form. The information on this blog follows the terms on our "Privacy and Security Statement" and cannot be construed as medical guidance or instructions for treatment.
We have 182 guests online
Marcia Crocker Noyes
(1869 – 1946)
Further to my comment on old books and research that started with an interesting bookplate (Ex-Libris). I continued my research and found that the person in charge of the Osler library bookplate was a fascinating individual that today maybe a ghost in the MedChi library and building in Baltimore... This is certainly an article that can be called "A Moment in History"
Marcia Crocker Noyes was the librarian at The Maryland State Medical Society from 1896 to 1946 and was a founding member of the Medical Library Association.[1][2][3]
Sir William Osler, MD. a famous Johns Hopkins surgeon was a noted bibliophile and had a large personal collection of books on various topics. When he became the President of MedChi in 1896, he was dismayed at the condition of the library and knew that with the right person and some stewardship, it could become a significant collection. Sir William asked his friend, Dr. Bernard Steiner, a physician and President of the Enoch Pratt Free Library in Baltimore for suggestions of a librarian, and Dr. Steiner recommended Marcia Crocker Noyes. A native of New York, and a graduate of Hunter College, Marcia had moved to Baltimore for a lengthy visit with her sister, and took a “temporary” position at the Pratt Library, which turned into three years. Although she had no medical experience or background, she was enthusiastic, and most importantly, she was willing to move into the apartment provided for the librarian, who needed to be available 24 hours a day.
The image in this article is Ms. Noyes on her first year on the job. Marcia developed a book classification system for medical books, based on the Index Medicus, and called it the Classification for Medical Literature. The system uses the alphabet with capital letters for the major divisions of medicine and lower-case ones for the sub-sections. The system was used for many years, but it's now dated and the Faculty's original shelving scheme was never changed. The card catalogs still reflect her classification and many of the cards are written in Marcia's back-slanting handwriting.
Marcia knew enough to ask the Faculty's members about medical questions, terminology and literature. She gradually won over the predominantly male membership and they became her greatest allies; Sir William at the start, and then for nearly 40 years, Dr. John Ruhräh, a wealthy pediatrician with no immediate family of his own. She made a point of attending almost every Faculty function, and in 1904, under guidelines from the American Medical Association, Marcia was made the Faculty Secretary. For much of her first 10 years, she was the Faculty's only full-time employee, only being assisted by Mr. Caution, the Faculty's janitor. Later in life Marcia would say that she hired him because of his name!
Within ten years, the library had outgrown its space, and plans, spearheaded by Marcia and Sir William before his move to Oxford, were made to build a headquarters building, mainly to house the library's growing collection of medical books and journals.
Marcia was instrumental in the design and building of the new headquarters. She travelled to Philadelphia, New York and Boston to look at their medical society buildings, and eventually, the Philadelphia architectural firm, Ellicott & Emmart was selected to design and build the new Faculty building. Every detail of the building held her imprimatur, from the graceful staircase, to the light-filled reading room, and all of the myriad details of the millwork, marble tesserae, and most of all, the four-story cast iron stacks. She was on-site, climbing up unfinished staircases, checking out the progress of the building, which was built in less than one year at a cost of $90,000.
Among the features of the new building was a fourth-floor apartment for her. She referred to it as the "first penthouse in Baltimore" and it had a garden and rooftop terrace. The library collection eventually grew to more than 65,000 volumes from medical and specialty societies around the world. Journals were traded back and forth, and physicians eagerly anticipated the arrival of each new issue. At the same time, Marcia was involved in the Medical Library Association as one of eight founding members. The MLA promotes medical libraries and the exchange of information. One of the earliest mandates of the MLA was the Exchange, a distribution and trade service for those who had duplicates or little-used books in their collections. Initially, the Exchange was run out of the Philadelphia medical society, but in 1900 it was moved to Baltimore and Marcia oversaw it. Several hundred periodicals and journals were received and sent each month, a huge amount of work for a tiny staff. In 1904, the Faculty had run out of room to manage the Exchange, so it was moved to the Medical Society of the Kings County (Brooklyn). But without Marcia's excellent administrative skills, it floundered and in 1908, the MLA asked Marcia to take charge once again.
In 1909, when the new Faculty building opened, there was enough room to run the Exchange and with the help of MLA Treasurer, noted bibliophile and close friend, Dr. John Ruhräh, it once again became successful. Additionally, Marcia and Dr. Ruhräh combined forces to revive the MLA's bulletin, which had all but ceased publication in 1908, taking the Exchange with it. This duo maintained editorial control from 1911 until 1926. In 1934, around the time of Dr. Ruhräh's death, Marcia became the first “unmedicated” professional to head the MLA. During her tenure, the MLA incorporated, the first seal was adopted, and the annual meeting was held in Baltimore. Marcia wanted to write the history of the MLA once she retired from full-time work at the Faculty, but her health was beginning to fail. She had back problems and had suffered a serious burn on her shoulder as a young woman, possibly from her time running a summer camp, Camp Seyon, for young ladies in the Adirondack Mountains. In 1946, a celebration was planned to honor Marcia's 50 years at the Faculty. But she was adamant that the physicians wait until November, the actual date of her 50 years. However, they knew she was gravely ill, and might not make it until then, so a huge party was held in April. More than 250 physicians attended the celebration, but the ones she was closest to in the early years, were long gone. She was presented with a suitcase, a sum of money to use for travelling, and her favorite painting of Dr. John Philip Smith, a founder of the Medical College in Winchester, Virginia. It was painted by Edward Caledon Smith, a Virginia painter who had been a student of the painter Thomas Sully.[4] She adored this painting and vowed, jokingly, to take it with her wherever she went.
The painting was not to stay with her for very long, for she died in November 1946, and left it to the Faculty in her will. Her funeral was held in the Faculty's Osler Hall, named for her dear friend. More than 60 physicians served as her pallbearers, and she was buried at Baltimore's Green Mount Cemetery. In 1948, the MLA decided to establish an award in the name of Marcia Crocker Noyes. It was for outstanding achievement in medical library field and was to be awarded every two years, or when a truly worthy candidate was submitted. In 2014, the Faculty began giving a bouquet of flowers to the winner of the award in Marcia's name, and in honor of her work. Much evidence exists for this tradition, as we know that the physicians, especially Drs. Osler and Ruhräh, frequently gave her bouquets of flowers. Marcia also cultivated flower gardens at the Faculty and decorated the rooms with her work.
Today, the MedChi building is open for tours and if the rumors are to be believed Ms. Marcia Crocker Noyes is still at work in her beloved library as the "resident ghost" [1][5]
NOTE: This article has been modified from the original Wikipedia article on Marcia Crocker Noyes. The article itself is well-written with interesting images of the subject. I would encourage you to visit it. The second insert is from book 00736 in my personal library and shows in pencil, the incredibly small handwriting of Marsha C. Noyes.
Sources:
1. "Marcia, Marcia, Marcia" MedChi Archives blog.
2. "Marcia C. Noyes, Medical Librarian" (PDF). Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 35 (1): 108–109. 1947. PMC 194645
3. Smith, Bernie Todd (1974). "Marcia Crocker Noyes, Medical Librarian: The Shaping of a Career" (PDF). Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 62 (3): 314–324. PMC 198800Freely accessible. PMID 4619344.
4. Edward Caledon BRUCE (1825-1901)"
5. Behind the scenes tour MedChiBuilding
"Clinical Anatomy Associates, Inc., and the contributors of "Medical Terminology Daily" wish to thank all individuals who donate their bodies and tissues for the advancement of education and research”.
Click here for more information
- Details
UPDATED: The root term for this word comes from the Latin [fenestram] meaning "window". [Fenestration] is "the presence or the act of creating a window". As an example, the term is used to describe a small, round opening found in the medial wall of the tympanic cavity (middle ear), the [fenestra cochleae] or [fenestra rotunda] meaning "round window" (see image 1).
I
IFenestrations can be found as natural occurrences in the body, as a result of an infection or destructive process or pathology, or they can be surgical procedures attempting to create a window, opening, or foramen. The cusps of all the heart valves can present normal fenestrations in the distal aspect of the cusp, beyond the coaptation or closure line. These become abnormal fenestrations when they occur below the coaptation line which may need to be repaired. Image 2 shows normal and abnormal fenestrations in the cusps of an aortic valve. Fenestrations in a valve cusp can be caused by endocarditis, among other causes.
Some surgical fenestrations that can be described are:
1. Fenestration of a tooth, allowing for drainage.
2. Pericardial fenestration, also known as a "pericardial window" to allow for drainage of excessive pericardial fluid (pericardial effusion).
3. Fenestration in a Fontan procedure, where a small opening or "window" is created to relieve excessive pressure in the venous circulation.
Word suggested by: J.Estrada
Original image #1courtesy of bartleby.com. Image#2 property of CAA, Inc.Artist: Dr. Miranda
- Details
This medical term [hypoacusia] is composed of the prefix [ hyp-], a derivate from the Greek [υπό] (ip? which means "under", "deficient" or "below". The root term [-acus-] is also a derivate from the Greek [ακούω] (ako?o?) meaning “listen”, or “hear”. The adjectival suffix [-ia] has a double meaning of “pertaining to” and “condition”. The term hypoacusia means then “a condition of deficient hearing”. It can also be used as [hypoacusis] with the same meaning.
A common mistake is to use this term for total deafness. This is not correct, in [hypoacusia] the patient has varying degrees of hearing loss, but there is some hearing function left.
There are many causes of hypoacusia: genetic, viral, bacterial, traumatic, etc. There are two types of hypoacusia. The first one is transmission hypoacusia, where the mechanical system that transmits vibration from the external ear and tympanic membrane (eardrum) to the inner ear can be damaged. The second type is neurosensory hypoacusia, where the components of the inner ear as well as the nerve structures of the vestibulocochlear nerve (VIII cranial nerve) up to and including brain areas related to the hearing process may be damaged.
Different degrees of hypoacusia have been demonstrated to affect proper communication functions and learning. Lower levels of hypoacusia (less than 25%) can be undiagnosed in small children; in fact, there are several studies that prove that the presence of low level hypoacusia in small children is a good predictor of language alteration and learning problems if not diagnosed properly and timely.
My personal thanks to Maria E. Gallegos, Chair of the Speech Pathology School, Iberoamerican University, Santiago Chile, for her help in this article. Dr. Miranda
- Details
This article is part of the series "A Moment in History" where we honor those who have contributed to the growth of medical knowledge in the areas of anatomy, medicine, surgery, and medical research.
The development of the series of articles on The history of surgical stapling [1] ; [2]; [3] was started because of personal communications with the family of the late Drs. Mark and Michael Ravitch.
This lead me to research on the biographies of the pioneers of surgery, anesthesia, and asepsis, as well as the life of those who invented, developed, and lead the way in the use of these now-widely-used surgical devices.
The most common question I received from the general public was "What are these surgical staplers and how are they used?". The following video answers these questions as well as the history of the development of surgical staplers. I sincerely hope that this video is well received by the Medical Industry and the public in general.
My personal thanks to the family of the late Drs. Mark and Michael Ravitch for their support, to the Museum of Surgical Staplers for images and links, and to the Covidien Surgical Products Division (today Medtronic Stapling) for providing the surgical staplers shown in this video. Dr. Miranda
This video was initially published in 2014, and directed by David M. Klein, Creative Director of Clinical Anatomy Associates, Inc.
- Details
This article is part of the series "A Moment in History" where we honor those who have contributed to the growth of medical knowledge in the areas of anatomy, medicine, surgery, and medical research.
Surgical staplers through history
In the mid 1900’s the Soviet Ministry of Health established in Moscow the Scientific Research Institute for Experimental Surgical Apparatus and Instruments. This was forced by the need to train surgeons to perform complex operations at long distances from the capital cities. The Institute developed an incredible array of instruments including single line, linear cutter, and circular staplers which had applications such as gastrointestinal stapling, bone staplers, skin staplers, cornea and vascular staplers. etc. One of the problems of these instruments was that since they were hand-made, the parts from different staplers were not necessarily interchangeable.
The Moscow Thoracic Surgical Institute had very good results with the bronchial stapler, and it was here that in 1958, almost by chance, Dr. Mark M. Ravitch (1910 – 1989) and three other American physicians had the opportunity to evaluate patients that had been operated with this instrument, as well as seeing it in use.
Again, totally by chance, Dr. Ravitch happened to find a store that carried this instrument and as he tells “…quite unnecessarily I am sure, I identified myself plainly as an American. The only instrument they had in stock that day was the bronchial stapler…” He brought the instrument to the Thoracic Institute where the personnel calibrated it. This instrument came back to the USA with him to start a revolution in surgery.
Back in the USA, Dr. Ravitch started research with this and other instruments he procured in later trips. He recruited Dr. Felicien Steichen (1926 – 2011) to work with him, starting a friendship and collaboration that would last until his death. Both Drs. Ravitch and Steichen helped perfect and develop the modern instruments we use today: The linear stapler, the linear cutter, and the circular stapler.
Once these instruments were introduced, the development and advancement of the technology was pioneered by medical industry in the USA. First with Mr. Leon Hirsch, founder of the U.S. Surgical Corporation (today Covidien Surgical Devices), and later by Johnson and Johnson’s Ethicon Endo-Surgery (today Ethicon). These companies developed first the reloadable reusable surgical staplers and later the disposable reloadable surgical staplers.
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was common with gynecologist, but not used by general surgeons. Dr. Erich Muhe (1938 – 2005) was the first to perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1985, followed by many others. With the advent of MIS, these companies launched the development of laparoscopic surgical staplers, quite common today.
What about the future? First is the development of newer stapling technologies that take into account the viscoelastic behavior of tissues under rapid compression, multiple height staple lines, microstaplers, etc. Then, the advent of NOTES (Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) needs the development of smaller and smaller surgical staplers that can be used through a natural orifice and delivered through a flexible endoscope. That is, for now, the new frontier of surgical stapling.
The history of surgical stapling [1] ; [2]; [3]; [Video]
Sources
1. "Surgical stapling" Mallina, R F 1962 Scientific American 207, 48
2. “Science of Stapling: Urban Legend and Fact” Pfiedler & Ethicon EndoSurgery
3. “Cholecystointestinal, gastrointestinal, enterintestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures” Murphy JB. Med Rec (1892) 42: 665
4. “Study of Tissue Compression Processes in Suturing Devices” Astafiev, G. (1967 (USSR Ministry of Health, Ed.)
5. “Rese?as Hist?ricas: John Benjamin Murphy” Parquet, R.A. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2010;40:97br />6. “The Science of Stapling and Leaks” Baker, R. S., & et al. (2004) Obesity Surgery, 14, 1290-1298.
7. “John Benjamin Murphy – Pioneer of gastrointestinal anastomosis”Bhattacharya, K., & Bhattacharya, N. (2008). Indian J. Surg., 70, 330-333.
8. “The Story of Surgery” Graham, H. (1939) New York: Doubleday, Doran & Co.. Inc.
9. “Compression Anastomosis: History and Clinical Considerations”Kaidar-Person, O, et al, e. (2008) Am J Surg, 818-826.
10. “Current Practice of Surgical Stapling”Ravitch, M. M., Steichen, F. M., & Welter, R. (1991) Philadelphia: Lea& Febiger.
11. “Aladar Petz (1888-1956) and his world-renowned invention: The gastric stapler” Olah, A. Dig Surg 2002: 19; 393-399
NOTE: The copyright notice for the images in this article can be found in the series "The History of Surgical Stapling" in this website
- Details
This article is part of the series "A Moment in History" where we honor those who have contributed to the growth of medical knowledge in the areas of anatomy, medicine, surgery, and medical research.
Pioneers of Surgical Stapling
Before the invention of the first surgical staplers some inroads where towards the development of automated suture devices and clamps that allowed surgeons to manipulate the tissues to obtain proper suture placement. These devices, some of them based on the first sewing machines did not survive the test of time.
The first true and successful surgical stapler was developed in 1908 by Dr. Hümer Hültl (1868 – 1940) in Hungary. Although heavy and cumbersome, this stapler had some of the concepts that are found today in modern surgical staplers: “B" shaped staples, staggered rows of staples, and attention to the avoidance of leakage through the staple line. Hültl’s stapler placed four staggered rows of wire staples. Today’s surgical staplers usually place two or three staggered rows of surgical titanium staples. History tells us that Dr. Hültl sold only 50 of his instruments because of high price, difficulty in reloading, and most importantly, the reticence of surgeons to adapt to this new technology.
In 1920 the Hültl stapler was improved by Dr. Aladar Petz (1888 – 1956), also Hungarian. The “Von Petz stapler” was lighter, easier to use, used silver staples, more affordable in price, and sold all over the world, allowing for surgeons to see this new technology in use.
Unfortunately, the Von Petz stapler could only be used once in surgery, as it needed to be cleaned, reloaded, and sterilized before reusing it. 1934 Dr. H Friedrich of Ulm Germany invented the replaceable cartridge, so that a surgical stapler could be reused multiple times in one surgery. This opened the way for a “triangular” type end-to-end anastomosis that until this time could not be performed. Also, Dr. Friedrich’s stapler had adjustable tissue compression.
Personal note: In 1987 I had the opportunity to scrub in one of the last uses of a Von Petz stapler in surgery (Chile, South America). This instrument was used to perform an “in toto” stapling and transection of the pulmonary hilum for a pneumonectomy. The instrument, after almost 40 years of its development, performed flawlessly. Dr. Miranda
Continued...
The history of surgical stapling [1] ; [2]; [3]; [Video]
Sources
1. "Surgical stapling" Mallina, R F 1962 Scientific American 207, 48
2. “Science of Stapling: Urban Legend and Fact” Pfiedler & Ethicon EndoSurgery
3. “Cholecystointestinal, gastrointestinal, enterintestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures” Murphy JB. Med Rec (1892) 42: 665
4. “Study of Tissue Compression Processes in Suturing Devices” Astafiev, G. (1967 (USSR Ministry of Health, Ed.)
5. “Rese?as Hist?ricas: John Benjamin Murphy” Parquet, R.A. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2010;40:97
6. “The Science of Stapling and Leaks” Baker, R. S., & et al. (2004) Obesity Surgery, 14, 1290-1298.
7. “John Benjamin Murphy – Pioneer of gastrointestinal anastomosis”Bhattacharya, K., & Bhattacharya, N. (2008). Indian J. Surg., 70, 330-333.
8. “The Story of Surgery” Graham, H. (1939) New York: Doubleday, Doran & Co.. Inc.
9. “Compression Anastomosis: History and Clinical Considerations”Kaidar-Person, O, et al, e. (2008) Am J Surg, 818-826.
10. “Current Practice of Surgical Stapling”Ravitch, M. M., Steichen, F. M., & Welter, R. (1991) Philadelphia: Lea& Febiger.
11. “Aladar Petz (1888-1956) and his world-renowned invention: The gastric stapler” Olah, A. Dig Surg 2002: 19; 393-399
- Details
This article is part of the series "A Moment in History" where we honor those who have contributed to the growth of medical knowledge in the areas of anatomy, medicine, surgery, and medical research.
Pioneers of Surgical Stapling
If you look at a desktop stapler, you will see that it is formed by very simple components: a staple, a pushing element, and an anvil that helps form the staple. This simple device has revolutionized surgery allowing surgeons to perform complex anastomoses and resections that otherwise could take a long time using sutures.
The story of surgical stapling starts with surgeons that established the parameters for a safe and leak-proof anastomosis as well as the tenets of antisepsis.
Christian Albert Theodor Billroth (1829 – 1894) set the parameters for gastrointestinal anastomoses when he developed the “Billroth I” and “Billroth II” procedures.
William S. Halsted (1852 – 1922), who started modern American medical education, set the “rules” for a good anastomosis and tissue management. Halsted preached for the use of small-gage sutures and needles, good surgical technique, and reduction of tissue trauma. Halsted proved empirically that a single-layered anastomotic suture worked as well as a double-layered suture line. Surgical staplers apply a single layer of staples.
In 1910 Halsted developed a non-suture anastomotic device, but it never went beyond the prototype stage.
The search for a safe end-to-end anastomosis led to the development of the “Murphy button” by Dr. John Benjamin Murphy (1857 – 1916) a “sutureless compression anastomotic device” in 1982, the precursor of some modern compression anastomotic devices, such as those developed by Novo GI (ex NiTi Surgical).
Continued....
The history of surgical stapling [1] ; [2]; [3]; [Video]
Sources
1. "Surgical stapling" Mallina, R F 1962 Scientific American 207, 48
2. “Science of Stapling: Urban Legend and Fact” Pfiedler & Ethicon EndoSurgery
3. “Cholecystointestinal, gastrointestinal, enterintestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures” Murphy JB. Med Rec (1892) 42: 665
4. “Study of Tissue Compression Processes in Suturing Devices” Astafiev, G. (1967 (USSR Ministry of Health, Ed.)
5. “Rese?as Hist?ricas: John Benjamin Murphy” Parquet, R.A. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2010;40:97.
6. “The Science of Stapling and Leaks” Baker, R. S., & et al. (2004) Obesity Surgery, 14, 1290-1298.
7. “John Benjamin Murphy – Pioneer of gastrointestinal anastomosis”Bhattacharya, K., & Bhattacharya, N. (2008). Indian J. Surg., 70, 330-333.
8. “The Story of Surgery” Graham, H. (1939) New York: Doubleday, Doran & Co.. Inc.
9. “Compression Anastomosis: History and Clinical Considerations”Kaidar-Person, O, et al, e. (2008) Am J Surg, 818-826.
10. “Current Practice of Surgical Stapling”Ravitch, M. M., Steichen, F. M., & Welter, R. (1991) Philadelphia: Lea& Febiger.
11. “Aladar Petz (1888-1956) and his world-renowned invention: The gastric stapler” Olah, A. Dig Surg 2002: 19; 393-3